Supplemental Response · September 2026
Vice President, Revenue Management & Distribution · Peregrine Hospitality

Heidi Cosio, CRME

Hospitality Revenue Strategist Executive

I’m an executive leader with a record of building and inspiring teams, turning around underperforming assets, and developing industry-leading tools and procedures at global scale. I spent seventeen years at Aimbridge Hospitality, most of it in revenue leadership and ending as Senior Vice President of Revenue Strategy over a 1,000-hotel portfolio. I’m currently Senior Director of Solutions Engineering at Lighthouse, working the technology and distribution side of the industry from the vendor’s vantage point. I’m comfortable in front of ownership groups, executive teams and boards.

Dallas Metroplex, TX · heidi.d.cosio@gmail.com
01 Portfolio Scope and Complexity

“Describe the most complex hotel portfolio you have led. Please include the number and types of properties, brands versus independents, geographic scope, and the size of your revenue management and distribution team.”

1,000+ hotels  ·  60 operating brands  ·  economy through luxury  ·  United States and Caribbean

As Senior Vice President of Revenue Strategy at Aimbridge Hospitality, I led revenue and distribution for more than 1,000 hotels across the United States and the Caribbean. The hotel count isn’t really the hard part. We operated sixty brands, which means sixty sets of standards, systems, rate structures and brand.com dynamics running at the same time, and four different asset types underneath them that all price differently.

Portfolio composition Select a cohort

The cohort that matters most for this role sits at the right of that bar. The independents and the soft brands had to generate their own demand rather than inherit it, and more than sixty of them carried no flag at all. The portfolio ran from economy select service up through luxury, lifestyle and destination resorts, including a handful of all-inclusive resorts, where pricing resolves to pax rather than rooms and most revenue management systems stop being useful.

I ran distribution myself for the first year before I built the function and hired a Director of Distribution under me. I mention that on purpose: I know what the function needs because I did the work before I staffed it.

Revenue and distribution organization

Vice Presidents of Revenue Strategy4
Regional Vice Presidents of Revenue6
Regional Directors of Revenue22
Revenue Managers and support staff~140
Total revenue organization~170
Departmental budget$21M
02 Strategic Revenue Leadership

“Share an example of a portfolio-level revenue strategy or change you led. What was the opportunity or challenge, what did you change, and what was the result?”

Fix the Mix, 2021. The premise: ADR lift is 80% business mix and 20% confidence.

The trap. Coming out of the pandemic we were seeing exceptional demand, but we were still carrying a lot of discounted business — travel nurse contracts, group rates that had been set too low, 25%-off advance purchase promotions. Instead of addressing those, people were just raising their retail price point. They priced themselves out of the demand, and their ADR still didn’t improve, because they couldn’t see what was actually holding it down.

The reason. People were looking at STR, seeing that their rate wasn’t moving, and stopping there. Nobody was getting to the underlying cause, because the reporting to do that didn’t really exist at the time.

What I built. A framework that showed actual consumption by segment and value on the left, and a space on the right to play with it. If I remove this corporate account, or cap the contract business, or drop the advance purchase promotion, what does that do to my ADR? I automated the reporting into our internal financial reporting system and ran the training company-wide.

What it unlocked. Once people could see the trade in front of them, they were willing to make a move most of them wouldn’t have made on their own: bring retail down to the price point the market actually supports, cut the low-value base, book fewer rooms, and let occupancy come down on purpose so ADR could come up.

The model, in miniature Illustrative — a 250-room hotel. Not portfolio data.
Retail rate$210
Share of displaced rooms recaptured at retail80%

If you drag the recapture down, the trade stops paying. That was the part people had to see for themselves: this only works when there is enough demand behind the business you are turning away.

Occupancy
96.0%
ADR
$169.02
RevPAR
$162.26
Turn segments off to model the trade.

Where the resistance came from. It didn’t come from ownership. Owners were already pushing for rate, because insurance and operating costs had gone up to the point where the low-rate business wasn’t covering itself anymore, and they knew it. Operations and the GMs wanted a turnaround too. The pushback came from sales, who were still in the heads-in-beds mindset from 2020. I didn’t get them there with a mandate. I gave them a black-and-white view of the trade and let them pick the easiest cut first, and the result made them willing to try the next one.

How it was installed — and why it stuck

01
Pilot inside the revenue team
02
30–60 days of field-identified opportunities
03
Case studies from hotels that moved
04
Regional rollout on that evidence
05
Embedded in new-hire onboarding
06
Reporting automated
07
Monthly mix review as standard practice
08
Extended to forward-looking mix on the books

We proved it small, let the results do the convincing, built it into onboarding so it would survive turnover, and then automated it so it ran without us. That is how I would go about setting operating standards at Peregrine. The last step is the one most programs skip: once the reporting was automated we could pull forward mix as well as historical, so a hotel sitting group-heavy three months out could do something about it then instead of explaining it later.

+2%
Portfolio ARI growth
1,000+
Hotels in scope
2021
HSMAI Top 25 Extraordinary Minds
Where the idea came from

A 250-room Hyatt House in downtown Washington, D.C.

Years before Fix the Mix, this hotel ran at 96 to 100% occupancy with rates north of $500. A hotel like that doesn’t have an occupancy problem, so every conversation about it was really a mix conversation. We opened government too wide to start — that one was mine — and then tiered it back with data until we found the threshold. Thirty government rooms out of 250 was all it took to hold the house.

It still didn’t work. Retail wasn’t flowing in behind the cap. So we went back to the drawing board, and the cause turned out to be contractual. There was a government per-diem agreement carrying last room availability, and no inventory control was going to out-maneuver that. We fixed it by restricting room types and revisiting the agreement at renewal, and we lost revenue in the months it took us to find it.

You cannot yield your way out of a bad contract.

Every tactical lever sits downstream of terms somebody already signed. That hotel taught me that mix beats price on a single asset. Fix the Mix is the same idea at a thousand.

03 Independent Hotels

“Describe your experience leading revenue strategy for independent hotels.”

A brand is a distribution channel. A very well recognized one.

Take the flag away and you haven’t lost a logo, you’ve lost a demand engine, and you have to build a replacement out of channels you pick deliberately. That’s why independent revenue strategy is a distribution problem before it’s a pricing problem.

I led strategy for more than sixty true independents at Aimbridge, plus a soft-branded cohort that operated much the same way. What I learned running them:

  • Channel value is asset-specific, never portfolio-uniform. A luxury lifestyle independent in Napa is going to do just fine on its own website. A smaller independent in a tertiary market needs Booking.com to be the engine. Same category, opposite strategies. The standard has to be the diagnostic, not the answer.
  • Production is leverage. If a channel is driving the hotel, that volume buys you better commission terms, better placement, and access to their loyalty and value programs. Distribution cost is negotiable, but you need the production to negotiate with.
  • Source market picks the channel. Caribbean independents look US-sourced until you actually check. There’s a large European feeder, which means European wholesalers and channels you would never stand up if you were working off a domestic template.
  • Wholesale needs a ceiling. Wholesalers ask for 35% off. That’s not a reason to fill the hotel with it. You blend the deep discount against 10%-commission business and manage the distribution cost mix, not just the rate.
  • Price to the capture rate, not the sell rate. In markets where everything transacts at a discount off retail, BAR turns into a vanity number nobody books. So you don’t set retail to what the market would pay. You set it so that after the discount everybody is going to take, the rate you capture is the one the asset actually needs.

What I see now, from the other side of the table

Eighteen months at Lighthouse has given me a look across a lot of independent hotels instead of one operator’s portfolio. Four things go wrong over and over:

  • No closed loop on spend. Marketing dollars get allocated without tying spend to capture to return, so nothing compounds and every year starts over.
  • Reacting to bookings instead of intent. Flight search and travel-intent signals show demand forming out of a source market well before a room books. Most independents wait for on-the-books to move, and by then the rate they could have held is gone.
  • Nobody is awake when the demand is shopping. European travelers shop US hotels in the middle of the night. That’s a coverage gap, and it’s the least glamorous and most practical thing AI currently solves.
  • Invisibility in AI search. When a traveler asks an assistant for the best hotels in New York, what surfaces isn’t decided by traditional site optimization alone. It’s editorial presence, news mentions, social, backlinks, community work. It’s first-principles web presence all over again, and almost no independent is working it.

That last one is really a distribution cost problem, not a marketing problem. Every booking an independent wins because an assistant surfaced it is a booking that didn’t pay 15 to 25% to an OTA. It’s the cheapest channel available and right now nobody is competing for it.

A branded hotel can’t move on this without permission. An independent can do it this quarter.

That’s the opportunity in Peregrine’s independent portfolio I’d want to go after first.

04 Commercial Storytelling

“Share an example of how you explained a complex revenue or market issue to an executive, owner, or investor. How did you simplify the story, and what decision or action followed?”

The way I think about storytelling is setting the stage so somebody can see the picture.

I approach it with transparency and with data, and I take the emotion out of it. When the numbers are good the emotion doesn’t matter much. When they’re bad it’s the only thing that can sink you. Below is the sequence I use, with the example running through it — the case I built to get an executive team to fund an enterprise business intelligence platform they hadn’t asked for.

Step 01Do the work before the room
I had been carrying this problem since 2015 and had taken it up twice before without getting it funded. I knew the vendor, I knew where the integrations fell short, and I knew exactly why the earlier attempts hadn’t worked.
Step 02Take the emotion out
The case wasn’t that our teams were frustrated, even though they were. It was three arguments, and only one of them was about revenue.
Step 03Here is the problem we identified
Our revenue teams worked across multiple brand platforms and multiple logins. Onboarding was slow, training was slower, and decisions waited on somebody reconciling data by hand. After the merger took us past 1,000 hotels it stopped being only a revenue problem — IT couldn’t build dashboards without normalized on-the-books data across all the brands either. That is when it became fundable.
Step 04Here is the approach, and what was behind it
Three things. We had real leverage, because they had been courting us for eight years and our production mattered across their entire product suite, so we were never going to pay the proposal price. Second, they could return our normalized on-the-books data across every brand as a contract term, which solved the revenue problem and IT’s problem in one line item. Third, the platform let us move our revenue teams from an 8:1 hotel ratio to 12:1, and on an organization our size that was real money.
Step 05Here is what actually happened
Signed in 2023, live January 1, 2024. I ran the implementation from the client side and we onboarded more than 1,000 hotels in under three months, which was the fastest the vendor had ever done.
Step 06Close the loop
We got to 12:1, and 15:1 in some markets. The data-return term was delivered, and it was a term no other customer had obtained.
Before
8:1
After rollout
12:1
Strongest markets
15:1

Hotels per revenue manager. That ratio change is what paid for most of the platform, and it is the number I would put in front of an owner before we ever talked about the technology.

The part I would underline for an ownership audience isn’t the savings. It is that I made the case and then I delivered it. When an executive team approves capital on a technology argument, what they are really asking is whether it is going to land, or whether it is going to take eighteen months and a consultant to sort out. This one was live in ninety days.

05 Distribution Strategy

“Give an example of a meaningful distribution strategy change you led. What did you change, and what impact did it have?”

We had a thousand hotels each buying distribution on their own. The change was to stop doing that.

Before. Distribution came to us inbound and fragmented. A hotel would sign its own agreement, the vendor would push that contact up to corporate, and a lot of what my team did was manage what the individual hotels had already done rather than go find the right partners in the first place.

What I changed. We stopped waiting for vendors to come to us through hotels and went to where the buyers were. At IPW in San Antonio in 2023 we sat down with a new operator or wholesaler every fifteen minutes for three days, and we qualified them against what mattered to our portfolio rather than what mattered to them: who will work with dynamic pricing, who cares about discount value rather than commission, and who has real production in LATAM and the Caribbean.

The leverage play. The sharpest piece was Booking.com. We opted branded hotels into the Genius program where the brand allowed it, and we spent that production across the whole account — better positioning, better commission, and advertising dollars we could put behind the hotels that needed them.

On its own, a sixty-hotel independent portfolio has no negotiating position. Attached to nine hundred branded hotels, it has a real one.

Partners negotiated

Booking.com Priceline Agoda Travel Leaders Network WebBeds Hotelbeds Hopper HotelTonight Hotel Engine — group HotelPlanner — group
~$150M
Incremental revenue across new and renegotiated agreements
Portfolio
Production aggregated into centrally negotiated MSAs

A note on reading the landscape

Around the same time, Hopper was trying to get out from under its supply relationship with Expedia, got cut off, and came to us directly for inventory. We were at that table while it was happening. I include it because distribution partners are not fixed infrastructure. The supply chain rewires itself, sometimes very quickly, and when you are running a portfolio that size you have to decide in the moment which of those changes to back and which to sit out. Being close enough to the partners to see it coming is most of what makes that call possible.

A closing note

Why this portfolio, and why now.

I never left hospitality. I stepped out of the management company side of it and went looking for a different skill set. Eighteen months in solutions engineering has given me the technology and distribution side I didn’t have as an operator, and a look across a lot of hotels instead of one portfolio. I’m happy where I am, which is exactly why I’m selective about what would move me.

What interests me about Peregrine is the shape of it. Sixty-four hotels and a single ownership perspective means a decision actually reaches an asset. At a thousand hotels across dozens of ownership groups, strategy travels through a lot of layers before it ever touches a rate. And the independent and resort weighting here is where the distribution economics and the AI-discovery work I described have the most room to run, because an owner/operator is the only structure that can move on that quickly.

I’d welcome the conversation.

Heidi Cosio, CRME Dallas Metroplex, TX heidi.d.cosio@gmail.com

Prepared for Global Career Horizons · September 2026